How we judged a primary care physician? 美國版,分數和你所吸引到的病人群相關…
美國認為pay for performance很重要…不過好的病人群才是拿高分的原因之一 有好原料才能燒好菜 不過衡量primary care physician的HEDIS指標,比起我們健保局的各項品質指標 實在是差太多了,健保局真是青出於藍勝於藍啊!! 但是,控制到了什麼呢? 指標是真相嗎? 拿慢箋開立率好了,為了達成這個目標,常常一拿三個月藥,multiple co-morbidities的病人哪有那麼易與的? 地區醫院還好住院容易,常常要幫醫學中心的病人cover倒是真的……嚴重妨害醫療品質,真是蛋頭指標,省錢指標… How can you judge a man by these stupid fiugures? 管理的目的不在此,蛋頭啊!! Clinical Performance Rankings of Primary Care Physicians Rankings are influenced by socioeconomic characteristics of patient panels. Physician quality measures are used increasingly for pay-for-performance and other clinical incentive programs. To assess how patient socioeconomic characteristics influence physician rankings, researchers reviewed records for 125,000 patients of 162 primary care physicians in a Massachusetts academic primary care network. Physicians were initially ranked in tertiles without adjustment, based on nine HEDIS (Health Effectiveness Data and Information Set) criteria, including screening for breast, cervical, and colon cancers, and ris...